Direct and Indirect Effects of Gizzard Shad on Bluegill Growth and Population Size Structure
نویسندگان
چکیده
—Competition with gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum has been shown to influence survival of larval bluegills Lepomis macrochirus as well as growth and size structure of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides, which prey on these planktivorous species. However, little is known about how the presence of gizzard shad influences bluegills beyond the larval stage. We examined bluegill–gizzard shad interactions across 10 reservoirs with and 10 without gizzard shad to determine direct and indirect effects of gizzard shad on bluegill population size structure. In the presence of gizzard shad, bluegills exhibited smaller adult (.3 years old) size structure. Benthic invertebrate densities were higher in non-gizzard shad reservoirs, which may have contributed to increased bluegill growth in these systems. In contrast, zooplankton densities were similar in reservoirs with and without gizzard shad. Turbidity was higher in reservoirs with gizzard shad, which may have reduced foraging success and growth of bluegill. Finally, higher bluegill densities occurred in reservoirs with gizzard shad, which may have resulted from decreased largemouth bass predation due to gizzard shad availability as alternative prey. These results demonstrate that the presence of gizzard shad is associated with reduced bluegill growth rates and adult size structure and that mechanisms other than direct competition for food resources may be responsible. Gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum is a common freshwater fish species that can predominate fish biomass in many central and southern U.S. reservoirs (Johnson et al. 1988; DeVries and Stein 1992; Stein et al. 1995). Occupying an intermediate trophic level, gizzard shad can have tremendous influence on reservoir systems through middle-out community regulation (Stein et al. 1995). Foraging by gizzard shad can influence zooplankton and phytoplankton communities (Cramer and Marzolf 1970; DeVries and Stein 1992; Schaus and Vanni 2000) and the abundance and size structure of piscivores (Swingle 1946; DeVries et al. 1991; Michaletz 1998a, 1998b). Gizzard shad can affect growth and size structure of piscivores through competition with other zooplanktivorous prey-fish species (e.g., Dettmers and Stein 1992; Garvey and Stein 1998a). The links between these competitive interactions at intermediate trophic * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Present address: Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1680 University Drive, Mansfield, Ohio 44906, USA. 2 Present address: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1801 South Oak Street, Lake City, Minnesota 55041, USA. Received September 7, 2001; accepted June 19, 2002 levels and timing of piscivory, growth rates, and size structure of piscivores have received considerable attention (Kirk and Davies 1987; Guest et al. 1990; DeVries and Stein 1992; Pope and DeVries 1994; Dettmers and Stein 1996; Olson 1996; Roseman et al. 1996; Garvey and Stein 1998a; Michaletz 1998a, 1998b). However, information about eventual effects on the adult populations of the interacting zooplanktivore species is generally lacking. Bluegills Lepomis macrochirus commonly compete with gizzard shad for food resources in reservoir systems. Larvae of both species prey extensively on zooplankton, and that competition influences growth and survival of larval bluegills (DeVries and Stein 1992; Welker et al. 1994; Garvey and Stein 1998b; Garvey et al. 1998) and reproductive success of adults (Kirk et al. 1986). The mechanism responsible is probably exploitative competition for zooplankton, which gizzard shad have the potential to control and significantly reduce (Cramer and Marzolf 1970; Dettmers and Stein 1992, 1996; DeVries and Stein 1992; Welker et al. 1994; Stein et al. 1995). These interactions may be mitigated by the timing of bluegill spawning. Bluegills are protracted spawners, and the timing of their spawning bouts and the subsequent emergence of larvae relative to that of gizzard shad
منابع مشابه
Effects of agricultural subsidies of nutrients and detritus on fish and plankton of shallow-reservoir ecosystems.
Agricultural activities increase exports of nutrients and sediments to lakes, with multiple potential impacts on recipient ecosystems. Nutrient inputs enhance phytoplankton and upper trophic levels, and sediment inputs can shade phytoplankton, interfere with feeding of consumers, and degrade benthic habitats. Allochthonous sediments are also a potential food source for detritivores, as is sedim...
متن کاملFood Consumption by Larval Gizzard Shad: Zooplankton Effects and Implications for Reservoir Communities
—Because peak abundance of larval gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum occurs simultaneously with the midsummer decline of macrozooplankton in Ohio reservoirs, we hypothesized that zooplanktivory by larval gizzard shad caused this decline. To test this hypothesis, we compared larval food consumption with zooplankton productivity in two reservoirs. Larval gizzard shad began to influence zooplankton ...
متن کاملBiomass-Dependent Diet Shifts in Omnivorous Gizzard Shad: Implications for Growth, Food Web, and Ecosystem Effects
—We examined diet patterns of omnivorous gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum in Acton Lake, Ohio, during 1994–1997 using a multiple stable isotope analysis to quantify the role of this species in the system. On most dates, zooplankton were relatively depleted in d13C (about 230‰ to 225.5‰) compared with sediments (225‰), permitting construction of a mixing model to determine the proportion of C de...
متن کاملInteractions between Larval White Crappie and Gizzard Shad: Quantifying Mechanisms in Small Ponds
—To test potential competitive interactions between larvae of white crappie Pomoxis annularis and of gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum. we added adult gizzard shad to eight of twelve 0.1-ha ponds that had been stocked with adult white crappies. Larval white crappies and larval gizzard shad appeared within 1 week of one another and larval white crappie density did not differ between treatments. Z...
متن کاملInterspecies Scaling of the Bioaccumulation of Lipophilic Xenobiotics in Fish: an Example Using Trifluralin
A poorly understood factor that may influence differences in the accumulation of a xenobiotic among fishes is interspecies differences in physiology. We have extensively studied the uptake, distribution, and excretion kinetics of the lipophilic herbicide trifluralin (TF) in fish, using a static water exposure system and compartmental toxicokinetic models. We obtained quantitative estimates of p...
متن کامل